Clark County Judge Erika Ballou Denies Allegations of Bias and Prejudice Against Police

The controversy surrounding Clark County Judge Erika Ballou continues to escalate as she vehemently denies allegations of bias and prejudice against police officers. In response to a state judicial ethics complaint, Ballou, through her attorney, refuted each accusation of misconduct, insisting that she has never shown preferential treatment based on race or occupation.

The complaint, filed by the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline, stems from statements made by Ballou in open court that were critical of law enforcement. In one instance, she excused a defendant’s decision to flee from police, citing reasons related to race. This led to backlash from two police groups, including the Las Vegas Police Protective Association, who called for her resignation and an ethics investigation.

Despite the mounting pressure, Ballou remains defiant, pointing out that no prosecuting agency has ever sought her recusal in a criminal matter due to bias or prejudice against law enforcement. She also highlighted her background as a public defender for over 15 years before becoming a judge in 2021.

The controversy surrounding Ballou also extends to her social media posts, including a photo of her in a hot tub with two public defenders, which led to ethics charges. However, Ballou maintains that her actions have never compromised her integrity as a judge.

As the situation continues to unfold, the fate of Judge Erika Ballou remains uncertain, with her current term set to end in 2027. Stay tuned for further developments on this ongoing legal saga.